Three Definitions of Plain Language
By Cheryl Stephens
Definition 1 -- Brian Garner
Brian Garner, in The Elements of
Legal Style, answers:
What do we mean by "plain language"? I
define it as the idiomatic and grammatical use of language that
most effectively presents ideas to the reader. By that
definition, plain language may be, in some sense, unplain. Who
would call Kant's categorical imperative plain, despite the
seeming simplicity of the words? "Act as if the maxim on
which you act were to become, through your will, a universal
law." On the other hand, who would volunteer to simplify
it?
Most of us, when writing, are not framing Dantian thoughts. We
should stick to a plain approach. Our age prefers it... Your
readers are the ones, finally, who matter: You have invited them
to attend your words, you seek their precious time, and you may
even expect to be paid for your efforts. Courtesy requires that
you show your readers some grace and consideration.
Definition 2 -- The Minister of Multiculturalism and
Citizenship
The Office of the Minister of Multiculturalism and Citizenship
of Canada says, in Plain Language: Clear and Simple:
"Plain language writing is a technique of
organizing information in ways that make sense to the reader. It
uses straightforward, concrete, familiar words. You can use these
techniques to adapt what you have to say to the reading abilities
of the people who are likely to read your document. Using plain
language to explain concepts and procedures involves using
examples that relate to your reader's
experience..."
Plain language:
- Reaches people who cannot read well.
- Helps all readers understand information.
- Avoids misunderstandings and errors.
- Saves time, because it gets the job done well the first
time.
Definition 3 -- Cathy Chapman
Cathy Chapman was Director of the National Literacy
Secretariat and was a key person in the Canadian government's
plain language implementation program. At the Just Language
Conference in Vancouver, she offered this definition:
"Plain language is a technique of organizing
information in ways that make sense to the reader, and thinking
about your reader first and foremost and using language that is
appropriate for your audience's reading
skills."
In its annual report for 1991-1992, the Plain Language
Institute of British Columbia stated:
"When we first tell people that we promote the
use of plain language in legal documents, most breathe a sigh of
relief. They think they will never again have to wade through
Latin, archaic English, or incomprehensible legal terms. But when
you work with the language of law or government, you quickly
realize that the challenge of plain language goes far beyond
vocabulary. You also have to think about how words are used,
sentences constructed, documents designed, and how people infer
meaning from words."
But even well-organized sentences that use commonly understood
words can be presented on the page in a way that makes the
message hard to understand. Organizations such as the
Communications Research Institute in Australia and the American
Document Design Centre (now the Information Design Center) have
done a great deal of work to understand how design affects
readability. They have helped create a body of knowledge about
almost every aspect of how words appear on paper.
Despite all that we have learned, defining what is
"plain" remains elusive. What is completely
understandable to one reader may be beyond another's
comprehension. Mark Vale, a specialist in clear language and
information management, points our that words are merely symbols,
and have no inherent meaning.
Meaning exists in the minds of people. If they wish to
communicate with one another, they must choose symbols which mean
similar things to both writer and reader. But how do we know what
meaning a reader will give to any particular word symbol? Our
task is made even more difficult, and more critical, with the
knowledge that more than one in three Canadian adults have some
difficulty reading.
Reading theorists point out that people receive meaning from
text by reading a sentence and inferring the author's meaning
from it. The ability to make the correct inference depends on,
and varies with, the knowledge each reader has of the world in
general and the specific concepts which the writer addressed.
Asking "What does my reader know and understand?" can
help the writer choose appropriate words to deliver a
message.
The best way to know how readers will interpret words is to
ask them. Plain language means testing documents. Many people
fear document testing is an expensive and time-consuming process.
But there are many ways to test a document that need not be a
vacuum for money and time. For certain critical and widely
distributed documents, even expensive tests are cheaper than the
economic, social and personal costs that result when people are
unable to understand the documents important to their lives.
Plain language is not, as some suggest, "sending Dick and
Jane to court." Nor is it a false art of rendering English
down to a small monosyllabic vocabulary. It is the appropriate
and correct use of the full vocabulary in well-structured
sentences, following established rules of grammar. It is language
that is free of jargon and chosen with sensitivity to the needs
and prior knowledge of the intended reader.
Back to Cheryl Stephens main page.
© 2000 Cheryl Stephens All rights
reserved.