When a printed message should have an impact, attention should be paid to its quality. This is exactly what professional typographers do. Others also try to contribute to the product of the typographyers’ craftsmanship by trying to define the optimal conditions high quality print should meet. However, the practical and the scientific do not always lead to the same conclusions. Practical assumptions have been made about how to optimize design quality, based on experience, without having been tested or challenged. One would find this careless if investigation would point to more effective ways of designing. As a matter of fact, assumptions have sometimes been in conflict with research results. Research findings occasionally also contradict each other. This results in a complex situation for designers who would like to apply those findings in practice. Because of the lack of consensus and the fact that many designers are not familiar with the scientific study of design, designers often continue working in the same way as they did before.
The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of all the issues related to the selection of typefaces in a design. To this end, typographic research is reviewed and discussed in its relationship with the design practice. The review is intended for those who are new to typographic research, both applied psychologists and interested graphic designers. The basic factors that have to be considered in the graphic design of text will be presented as well as design guidelines which have evolved from the confrontation of research with design practice. The suitability of type to present information or to express meaning beyond the text content (atmosphere, emotion) is the main theme of this paper.
It should be noted that there are a number of topics which are related to reading and writing, but are not a part of typography. Therefore, they will only be mentioned where necessary in this paper, but not discussed in detail. These are topics such as psycholinguistics, executive control processes, and semiotics.
Typography itself can be divided into two general areas of application; hardcopy and CRT’s (cathode ray tubes). Hardcopy refers to information on paper and was the original focus of typography. Since the introduction of the computer, traditional typography has been joined by design for CRT’s such as television screens or monitors, also called video display terminals. Whereas the ‘old’ visual displays such as paper have stationary surfaces and reflect light, CRT screens are dynamic and emit light. This has a different effect on the reader’s eyes. Moreover, because information can be displayed dynamically on screen, its content can be updated such as is the case with Teletext. CRT-typography may have a lot in common with hardcopy- typography, but is still a different area with its own problems. Reading from screens, for instance, is generally slower and the demands on character size are different. Therefore, this recent field within typography will not be discussed here. However, static information displays other than paper, such as metal or plastics are implicitly included in the traditional typography.